|
New grinding process developments by Tyrolit, and machine tool developments
by Makino, are changing that thought process. Utilizing new grinding techniques,
incredible material removal rates up to 300 mm3/smm respective, 28 cubic inches
per minute, and one inch of wheel width are being achieved. And, it is being
done in the aerospace marketplace where the grinding of tough, nickel-based
alloy materials is common in aircraft engines and components.
Tyrolit History
Tyrolit is a global leader in grinding technology. The company is recognized
as one of the top three manufacturers of bonded abrasives worldwide and is the
market leader in Europe.
Tyrolit is a member of the Swarovski family of companies, which is a
manufacturer of fine crystal. The company entered into the development of bonded
abrasives over 100 years ago in its quest to make quality crystal. By the 1950s,
Swarovski had developed such an expertise in bonded abrasives that it started
Tyrolit, an independent business unit focused on the sale of bonded abrasives.
As is shown through this history, the Tyrolit approach to the market has
never been to just sell grinding wheels. Instead, the focus is on understanding
the customers’ specific needs, reviewing their processes and working jointly to
create the best solution. This led to the development of upgraded solutions for
coolant supply, component work holding/fixturing, as well as experimenting with
the variables in bonded abrasive manufacturing and use.
Tyrolit’s primary goal is to achieve the optimal grinding results, and to be
more than just a producer of grinding wheels and associated tooling. The
company’s focus is on the whole package and solution: a much broader concept for
conducting activities in the grinding research and development group.

Grinding Developments
During the early 1970s, creep feed grinding was first developed and utilized.
In creep feed grinding, the machine table feeds the work piece in the direction
of the grinding wheel rotation. While the table speed is slow—“creep feed”—the
depth of cut is very high, which results in a high material removal rate.
The creep feed grinding process offered significant productivity enhancements
over conventional grinding. This process soon was employed by a number of
worldwide manufacturers of aerospace turbo machinery parts.
As more experience was gained concerning the variables surrounding the creep
feed grinding process, there were two key attributes that emerged which would
have a significant impact on the productivity of creep feed grinding: coolant
supply and wheel dressing.

The Impact of Coolant on Grinding
The supply of coolant to the grinding wheel is vital to the grinding process.
The coolant helps keep the work
piece and grinding wheel cool so the material being machined is not burned. In
addition, the coolant transfers away the swarf material, keeping it from
fouling the wheel.
If the wheel becomes clogged with substrate material, the effective cutting
edges of the abrasive are dramatically reduced. Once the wheel is clogged,
the part manufacturer needs to redress the grinding wheel and expose newer,
sharp abrasive crystals to reestablish the profile geometry on the grinding
wheel.
A simple solution to surface cooling and grinding wheel flushing initially
appeared to have been the use of huge quantities of coolant. But, this solution
proved ineffective in that the grinding wheel would hydroplane over the
substrate material surface with too much coolant applied.
To optimize the creep feed grinding
process, testing proved it would require delivering just the right amount of
coolant to the cutting zone so as not to permit the grinding wheel to
hydroplane.
In order to achieve the proper balance in coolant delivery, extensive work
has been done with Rolls Royce and Makino. The result of this work is the
patented VIPER grinding process.

VIPER Grinding
VIPER (Very Impressive Performance Extreme Removal) grinding is a process
that requires close coordination between the machine, the coolant supply and the
composition of the grinding wheel. The principle behind VIPER grinding is that
the coolant is injected into the grinding wheel under high pressure ahead of the
grind, and centrifugal force then moves the coolant out of the wheel during the
grind, cleansing the wheel and cooling the material.
The comparative results of VIPER are remarkable. The process saves time and
money.
| |
Old,
Twin-Wheel
Creep Feed Process |
New
VIPER Process |
| Number of Operations |
8 |
2 |
| Cycle Time |
40 Minutes |
10 Minutes |
| Consumable Costs |
$4 / part |
$2 / part |
| Machine Tools Required |
5 |
1 |
| Throughput Time |
30 days |
8 hours |
- A bearing housing using the VIPER process, as opposed to turning and
milling, reduced the cycle time by 66 percent. The number of setups was
reduced from 8 to 3, and the consumable cost was reduced by 50 percent.
- A casing that took 10 hours to mill was ground completely in only 4
hours.
- The cycle time of a compressor blade was cut by 50 percent from 8
minutes to 4 minutes using VIPER as opposed to conventional grinding, with a
greater than 2 CPk quality measurement. Consumable costs were cut by 80
percent, and the overall cost was cut by 50 percent.
- A turbine blade manufactured with a twin-wheel creep feed grinding
machine, which utilized very large and expensive grinding wheels, required 8
machining setups. With VIPER grinding, the blade was completed in 2 setups.
The process used smaller grinding wheels that dramatically reduced costs and
time.

Nozzle Control
The key to VIPER grinding coolant performance is the ability to deliver it at
the proper pressure and orientation to the specially formulated grinding wheel.
Makino developed an innovative, programmable coolant nozzle system that enables
the jets to be positioned at any location around the circumference of the wheel.
It further enables the machine to control the gap between the grinding wheel and
the exit tip of the nozzle jet, as well as the impingement angle of the coolant
hitting the grinding wheel.
The ability to control these factors and the coolant pressure and temperature
enable the machine to precisely control the coolant delivery variables. In
addition, the Makino system enables the coolant nozzle jet to be automatically
changed during the grinding process.
When a grinding wheel with a new profile is used, the coolant nozzle jet can
be changed concurrently to match the new profile. This optimizes the VIPER
grinding results by ensuring the proper delivery of coolant to grind.
 |
 |
|
The key to VIPER grinding coolant performance is the
ability to deliver it at the proper pressure and orientation to the specially
formulated grinding wheel.
|
|
 |
Utilizing the VIPER grinding process, manufacturers achieve metal removal
rates up to 5-times greater than they achieved with traditional creep feed
grinding. As it was initially developed, VIPER was intended as an intermittent
dress grinding process. Recently, this process was enhanced further by utilizing
a continuous dress of the grinding wheel, which is necessary for extreme rates
of stock removal.

Continuous Dressing
Continuous dressing is a process enhancement that was developed for the creep
feed grinding process and resulted in productivity enhancements of up to 90
percent over normal, intermittent dress creep feed grinding. The continuous
dress process ensures there are always sharp, abrasive cutting edges exposed
during the grind.
Continuous dressing maintains constant pressure between the dressing roll and
the grinding wheel, which is adjustable to ensure the proper amount of wheel is
exposed during each revolution. This is a process called micro-profiling, as
only a micron or less of wheel is removed with each revolution. This ensures
that fresh, sharp abrasive crystals are always properly supported in the bonding
material of the wheel.
In an intermittent dress grinding process, substrate builds up on the cutting
edges of the abrasive crystals on the wheel. As these edges build up, the
cutting forces increase dramatically, and the force causes the grinding wheel to
break down and large pieces are
actually broken off the grinding wheel. Once this occurs, the grinding wheel
must be redressed.
With continuous dress, the result is that there is no built up edge on the
abrasive crystals, and the normal forces exerted on the wheel are minimal. In
fact, when the dressing rate is properly set, continuous dress grinding actually
results in reduced wheel consumption despite the continuous dressing with each
revolution.

High-Speed CD Grinding
High-speed grinding occurs when the capabilities of VIPER grinding are
combined with the continuous dress process. With high-speed grinding,
manufacturers are achieving metal removal rates of 16 cubic inches per minute in
grinding inconel. This type of metal removal changes processing decisions, such
as when to machine the material with a cutting tool compared to a grinding
wheel. Grinding is no longer just a
finishing operation. Through extensive research and development, Tyrolit has
developed a grinding wheel that performs optimally in a continuous dress VIPER
grinding process. With high-speed grinding, it is possible to remove a greater
quantity of material with reduced consumable expense compared to high-speed
milling.
The following table provides a comparison of the productivity of the
different grinding processes. These grinding
processes are also separated between
the conventional grinding processes, which currently have widespread use
in industry, and the capabilities of the VIPER and high-speed continuous
dress grinding processes.
|
GRINDING PROCESS COMPARISON |
| |
Process Description |
Qw mm3/mm/sec |
Benefits |
Restrictions |
|
Current Technology |
Intermittent
Dress Creep
Feed Griding
(large grinding wheels) |
10-15 |
Low complexity |
Low productivity,
grinding wheel
profile form-
holding
capability is low |
| |
Continuous Dress
Creep Feed Grinding
(large grinding wheels) |
20-30 |
Grinding wheel
profile form-holding
capability is high |
Moderate productivity,
wheel usage high |
| |
Creep Feed Grinding
with Plated CBN, or
Vitrified CBN Grinding
Wheel |
5-10 |
Grinding wheel
profile form-
holding capability
is high |
Low productivity,
high grinding
wheel cost |
|
Emergent Technology |
Intermittent
Dress VIPER
Grinding |
50-70 |
Good productivity,
low wheel cost |
Grinding wheel profile
form-holding capability
is moderate, process
patented |
| |
High-Speed Continuous
Dress VIPER Grinding |
150-300 |
Excellent
productivity,
low wheel cost,
grinding wheel
profile form-holding
capability is high |
Equipment investment
is higher,
process patented |
The productivity factor Qw is the
number of cubic millimeters of material removed per second, per millimeter of
wheel width. This ratio accurately describes the efficiency of the grinding
process. In addition, there are some key benefits and limitations to each
grinding process.
This chart details a fairly large range
in the productivity of each grinding process. The ability to fixture and hold
the part being ground is the primary driver that determines if the actual
application will be at the high end or low end of the range. The more rigidly
the part can be held, the higher the potential Qw factor that can be achieved.
There are still limitations to grinding. Compared to milling, the limitation
is not the material removal rate. With grinding, wheel access is always an
issue. Traditionally, the part manufacturer has had to decide if a part would be
ground or milled.
The optimal solution is to have the flexibility to choose either grinding
or milling in the same machine. A machine with this capability changes
the processing decision, allowing the manufacturer to select either or both
processes as best for the geometry
being machined.

Processing Flexibility
Rolls-Royce and Tyrolit jointly approached Makino about the viability of
making such a flexible machine that would be optimal for an aerospace turbo part
manufacturing. The machine had to be configured to perform VIPER grinding, but
it also needed to have the ability to change all types of tools automatically.
Makino reviewed the request and created a machine tool that enables VIPER
grinding, intermittent dress grinding, continuous dress grinding and milling all
on the same machine. The automatic changing of grinding wheels and dressing
rolls is done in the same fashion as cutting tools are for milling.
Given the advent of the Makino machine, the aerospace part manufacturer can
make some part features, like drilled holes, through a rotating cutting tool.
Then, in the same operation, they can continuous dress and VIPER grind the
profile of the shape.
This multiple process provides the manufacturer with the greatest degree of
flexibility and productivity in the same operation. No longer does the
manufacturer need to decide if grinding or milling will produce the shape; now
they can have both in the same operation.
 |
 |
| Built-up edges cause increased cutting forces and grinding wheel breakdown. |
The ability to automatically change grinding wheels and dressing rolls
rapidly also further changes the dynamics of grinding. It is now possible to
select the right size of grinding wheel for the desired geometry. One
composition wheel can be used for rough grinding while a different composition
wheel can be used for finish grinding.
In the past, the manufacturer often had to make this compromise. If they
chose a very large wheel, they could have multiple profiles on the same wheel.
The wheel composition would also be compromised to best achieve the grind they
were attempting.
The grinding machine tool simply did not have the flexibility to rapidly
change wheels during the grinding operation. With the Makino machine tool, the
wheel is sized properly, minimizing waste, and the wheel is optimized to the
desired grind.
Tyrolit is very proud of its contribution to these advancements. These are
the types of leaps forward a company can make when it is focused on the total
needs of the customer, not just selling grinding wheels.
The collaboration of the Tyrolit, Rolls-Royce and Makino is dramatically
advancing the field of grinding.
Grinding is not just a finishing operation anymore!

|